试验场景一:要对同一个list实时添加元素,且放入缓存中。代码如下:
@Test
public void testMemCacheAndRedis() {
this.testInsert(1000);
}
public void testInsert(int size) {
MemCached memCached = (MemCached) ctx.getBean("configMemCache");
memCached.flushAll();
long before = System.currentTimeMillis();
List<Integer> list = new ArrayList<Integer>();
for (int i = 0; i < size; i++) {
list.add(i);
memCached.put("test", list);
}
long end = System.currentTimeMillis();
RedisTemplate<String, Object> redisTemplate = (RedisTemplate<String, Object>) ctx.getBean("bubbleRedisTemplate");
redisTemplate.delete("test123");
long before2 = System.currentTimeMillis();
for (int i = 0; i < size; i++) {
redisTemplate.boundListOps("test123").leftPush(i);
}
long end2 = System.currentTimeMillis();
System.out.println("memcached use time is " + (end - before));
System.out.println("redis use time is " + (end2 - before2));
}
当n=1000时的任意3次打印结果:
=============================================
memcached use time is 6282
redis use time is 1156
memcached use time is 6547
redis use time is 1172
memcached use time is 6234
redis use time is 1375
当n=2000时的任意3次打印结果:
=============================================
memcached use time is 22313
redis use time is 2328
memcached use time is 22969
redis use time is 2907
memcached use time is 22938
redis use time is 2234
当n=3000时的任意3次打印结果:
=============================================
memcached use time is 48859
redis use time is 3297
memcached use time is 48156
redis use time is 4547
memcached use time is 47765
redis use time is 3375
试验一结论(只对本次试验负责):当n在20条以内时,两者差异不大,但当n大于20时,redis在性能上的优势就会逐渐体现出来。
试验场景二:对程序做些稍许的改动,即将memCached.put("xwq", list);这一行移到for循环外面执行,代码如下:
@Test
public void testMemCacheAndRedis() {
this.testBatchInsert(3000);
}
public void testBatchInsert(int size) {
MemCached memCached = (MemCached) ctx.getBean("configMemCache");
memCached.flushAll();
long before = System.currentTimeMillis();
List<Integer> list = new ArrayList<Integer>();
for (int i = 0; i < size; i++) {
list.add(i);
}
memCached.put("test", list);
long end = System.currentTimeMillis();
RedisTemplate<String, Object> redisTemplate = (RedisTemplate<String, Object>) ctx.getBean("bubbleRedisTemplate");
redisTemplate.delete("test123");
long before2 = System.currentTimeMillis();
for (int i = 0; i < size; i++) {
redisTemplate.boundListOps("test123").leftPush(i);
}
long end2 = System.currentTimeMillis();
System.out.println("memcached use time is " + (end - before));
System.out.println("redis use time is " + (end2 - before2));
}
我们再做下试验:
当n=1000时的任意3次打印结果:
===================================================
memcached use time is 15
redis use time is 1188
memcached use time is 32
redis use time is 1188
memcached use time is 31
redis use time is 1234
当n=2000时的任意3次打印结果:
===================================================
memcached use time is 47
redis use time is 2437
memcached use time is 31
redis use time is 2344
memcached use time is 47
redis use time is 2265
但n=3000时的任意3次打印结果:
===================================================
memcached use time is 62
redis use time is 3406
memcached use time is 47
redis use time is 3391
memcached use time is 47
redis use time is 3688
试验二结论(只对本次试验负责):由此可以看出,memcached一次性将list放入到缓存中,比redis每次更新性能是要高很多的。
试验场景三:对同样大小的两个list,同时进行相同次数的读操作,代码如下:
@Test
public void testMemCacheAndRedis() {
// this.testInsert(3000);
// this.testBatchInsert(3000);
this.testRead(200);
}
public void testRead(int size) {
MemCached memCached = (MemCached) ctx.getBean("configMemCache");
memCached.flushAll();
List<Integer> list = new ArrayList<Integer>();
for (int i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
list.add(i);
}
memCached.put("test", list);
long before = System.currentTimeMillis();
for (int i = 0; i < size; i++) {
memCached.get("test");
}
long end = System.currentTimeMillis();
RedisTemplate<String, Object> redisTemplate = (RedisTemplate<String, Object>) ctx.getBean("bubbleRedisTemplate");
redisTemplate.delete("test123");
for (int i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
redisTemplate.boundListOps("test123").leftPush(i);
}
long before2 = System.currentTimeMillis();
for (int i = 0; i < size; i++) {
redisTemplate.boundListOps("xwq123").range(0, -1);
}
long end2 = System.currentTimeMillis();
System.out.println("memcached use time is " + (end - before));
System.out.println("redis use time is " + (end2 - before2));
}
当n=100时的任意3次打印结果:
============================================
memcached use time is 6765
redis use time is 281
memcached use time is 2187
redis use time is 297
memcached use time is 9547
redis use time is 313
当n=200时的任意3次打印结果:
============================================
memcached use time is 34250
redis use time is 546
memcached use time is 12171
redis use time is 547
memcached use time is 8297
redis use time is 516
当n=500时的任意3次打印结果:
============================================
memcached use time is 69437
redis use time is 1297
memcached use time is 43781
redis use time is 1516
memcached use time is 37750
redis use time is 1281
试验三结论(只对本次试验负责):同样是从缓存中读取数据,redis的性能是要远远高于memcached。
分享到:
相关推荐
redis与memcached比较,在做系统选型时,可以参考。系统升级时,也可以借鉴。
10.1.1 redis相比memcached有哪些优势?
memcached,redis性能测试,内存缓存系统的性能测试;
分布式缓存 Redis + Memcached 经典面试题!
计算机后端-PHP视频教程. Redis01 Redis与Memcached的区别.wmv
使用c#读取memcached中的数据,再转移到指定的redis中。解决比如token的保持,让客户端登录不效。
Memcached vs Redis,总结的十分清晰和详细。
php mysql redis nginx memcached
竞品分析之redis强于memcached redis主从切换 1.redis支持持久化(存盘),memcache只能存在内存中 2.redis的速度比memcached快很多.Redis直接自己构建了VM 机制 ,因为一般的系统调用系统函数的话,会浪费一定的时间去...
TreeNMS,TreeSoft数据库管理系统 for Redis, memcached,免费,超好用的Redis管理及监控工具treeNMS
Zend_Cache Redis Memcached 扩展
不光有含金量,还很有颜值。 Redis-vs-Memcached-Infographic-ScaleGrid-Blog
redis:Redis-x64-3.2.100.msi + Redis-x64-3.2.100.zip + php_redis-4.2.0-7.3-ts-vc15-x64.zip redis安装:.msi文件打开直接安装即可,注意选择添加patt选项 memcached: memcached-win64-1.4.4-14 + ...
高级分布式数据库教程,nosql,mongodb,redis。非常好的分布式教程!
主流的三种分布式数据库比较Memcached Redis MongoDB对比
分布式缓存 Redis + Memcached 经典面试题!
之前用过redis和MongoDB,但都是没有系统的学习,新公司用到memcached,所以去了解他们的区别和应用场景,方便理解。
canal 的 mysql 与 redis/memcached/mongodb 的 nosql 数据实时同步方案
基于redis2.0,添加了一个 memcached 端口,支持 memcached 协议。 支持 mc 的 flag 标志,支持 rdb,aof,monitor。 memcached 协议和 redis 协议可以操作同一份数据。 标签:medis redis
互联网分布式缓存技术 课程主讲: 互联网应用高级架构师 白贺翔涉及技术: Redis、SSDB、Memcached课程描述: 介绍互联网分布式技术的重要性、背景、应用范围;目前互联网行业使用分布 式缓存进行设计的比例,...